Use cases

So what do you actually do with Undernap?

You give a request as a goal — not as a prompt. These four cases show what Undernap then coordinates, where you decide, and what you end up holding at the end.

Engineering

Check a repository before a release

Your request: “Analyse this repository read-only: name the three biggest product risks and one safe next step for each.”
What Undernap coordinates: Undernap builds a read-only plan, staffs the analysis over your connected coding accounts, and has the result checked against the request.
Where you decide: You approve the plan — including the read-only limit — and you accept at the end.
What comes out: A risk report with file- and line-level evidence, checked by an instance that is not its author.

SEO & AI Visibility

Audit a website — without invented numbers

Your request: “Check our public website for technical, content and discoverability issues and tell me what to fix first.”
What Undernap coordinates: The SEO & AI Visibility specialist collects findings across public pages and marks every statement as observed, derived or inferred.
Where you decide: You approve the scope — which domain, how deep — and decide which findings become tasks.
What comes out: A sorted audit: findings with their grade, priority and reasoning — no metric without a provenance.

Research

Research a market and its competitors

Your request: “Research the five most important vendors for [X] and tell me where we are different.”
What Undernap coordinates: The research specialist works the question, separates observation from conclusion, and documents where the picture stays unclear.
Where you decide: You approve the plan with its source scope and decide whether going deeper is worth new cost.
What comes out: A briefing with evidenced statements, clearly marked assumptions and open questions — instead of a smooth narrative.

Marketing

Campaign drafts with a fact check

Your request: “Draft three positionings for our product and check each against what we can actually evidence.”
What Undernap coordinates: The marketing specialist drafts; the check holds every statement against the project knowledge and marks what is merely a claim.
Where you decide: You approve the plan, pick a direction — and you are the last authority before anything goes public.
What comes out: Three positionings graded statement by statement: evidenced, derived, or wishful.

The roles

Six specialists, one team

Roles are ways of working with a quality bar — not models. They arrive in the app step by step; which model runs a session is settled by your Fleet and the plan.

Marketing

Campaigns, messaging and marketing content — with a check that takes claims at their word.
Research

Work the question, separate the sources, name the uncertainty instead of smoothing it over.
SEO & AI Visibility

Check public pages and grade findings so you know what is hard evidence and what is assumption.
Design

Design and critique flows and interfaces — with reasons, not taste.
Engineering

Repository work with limits: read, analyse, implement — every change an evidenced step.
Knowledge / Support

Answers from your project knowledge, with the place the knowledge actually lives.

The figures are a preview — the specialists arrive in the app step by step.

What these cases are not

No promise of automatic outcomes: every mission needs your plan approval, and “done” is a verification result, not autopilot. These cases show how the specialists work — not benchmark numbers and not customer stories. Those are not here until they are real.

Your case may be a different one

Try it on your own case at the relaunch — planned for November 20.

Notify me at the relaunch Result & evidence

Undernap for macOS (Apple Silicon, macOS 15+) is planned to relaunch on November 20, 2026. From then on it is a monthly subscription, for businesses only; your first subscription starts with a free 14-day trial. Until the relaunch we take no orders and offer no download.